D. Salinger moon when you are a “bored light pet” shows up, goes over, and you may hits their left hand

An explanation regarding Seymour given that an actual physical organization nearly proves Pal’s undoing

/. Buddy certainly are the very first to help you recognize that the poems remove something-a great deal -inside “translation of the paraphrase.” Although pattern is obvious: unsentimentalized small times regarding significant light or epiphany; finely etched vignettes hence tell you the brand new “religious process” underneath the externals. Since the a critic, Seymour was illustrated owing to their feedback to your a number of Pal’s stories, plus the essence out-of their information was summarized in 2 concerns he tells Friend he will feel expected as the an author as he dies: “Was most of your stars aside? Have been your busy writing your own cardiovascular system away?” Even if Seymour’s issues, for example their poems, may not end up being paraphrased, he seems to suggest that perception and you will effect -in their strongest senses -have to be doing work in great composing; and also for the viewer they become those people challenging, indefinable qualities which might be profoundly swinging and you will lighting-up. When he passes through a catalogue away from Seymour’s actual qualities – tresses, ears, sight, nostrils, sound, body, gowns – he gets progressively more intrusive and less coherent, on occasion, apparently, painfully near disintegration (such as for example, he announces after a brief passageway on the Seymour’s ears, “I’m going to sleep. . . . The hands is sweat, the bowels churning. Brand new Incorporated Son is not https://datingranking.net/es/sitios-de-citas-estadounidenses/ yourself”). “Seymour: An intro” seems not so much a narrative while the a keen assemblage out of cards, observations, anecdotes, and you can irrelevancies (“flowering parentheses”), just like Buddy’s (otherwise Salinger’s) diary, at which a story you are going to eventually be made. New Seymour one exists is generally consistent with the Seymour i have come to learn already; this new matter try presented, the newest intricacies found, but no undoubtedly brand new size is set in their portrait. In a manner, following, the storyline try Friend’s, while we look for him the very first time throughout their heartache out of heart wanting to retain and 41

Throughout the tale, references are manufactured, such as on the performs one to Buddy possess created, one push which personality

bolster their learn to your evasive facts hiding in Seymour’s existence. He looks for the desperate need of him or her. He introduces himself in the beginning, with some paradox, given that an enthusiastic “ecstatically happier child”; as well as the end, as he prepares to see classification, he understands that “no single thing” he really does are “more significant than starting you to terrible Area 307.” Given that Seymour once said, “the i perform all of our entire existence are go from you to nothing piece of Holy Crushed to a higher.” “Seymour: An intro” could be thought to feel the setting you to definitely hides mode, together with the appearing irrelevancies deliberately designed to manage a level greater than usual illusion out of truth – the real truth (a technique, incidentally, quite normal, just like the experience Dostoevski’s “Cards of Below ground” or Rilke’s The laptop of Malte Laurids Brigge). However,, nonetheless, there’s an ongoing question regarding the author’s handle, any doubt that’s somewhat strengthened of the Pal’s perennial resemblance to Salinger. Certainly one of Pal’s really works is Brand new Catcher about Rye, one or two anyone else was “Raise High the latest Roof Ray, Carpenters” (where Pal are narrator) and you will “A perfect Big date to have Bananafish” (and then he wasn’t), nonetheless another try “Teddy” (Friend actually quotes of it). For example information because these while others don’t, needless to say, establish things, nevertheless they create strongly recommend – and only suggest – one Salinger is actually sharing, however obliquely, their own loss of handle and you can diffusion from ability. Salinger’s enough time silence adopting the appearance of “Seymour: An intro” from inside the 1959 try finished inside 1965 towards the publication of another part throughout the Glass tale, “Hapworth sixteen, 1924.” So it tale performed nothing to guarantees people who hoped-for a great go back to the sooner brilliance out-of Catcher about Rye. Actually, it tended to accentuate those individuals properties of one’s after work and that very clients receive disturbing- a boring length, a laughter usually worry about-consciously lovely, an excellent muting away from narrative in favor of philosophical asides. In spite 42

Theo Healthplus.vn