Trang chủ Dating apps visitors This study generally seems to prove for example a relationship (t = 2

This study generally seems to prove for example a relationship (t = 2

08/03/2023

Chưa có bình luận

17 lượt xem

This study generally seems to prove for example a relationship (t = 2

The fresh detailed statistics off, and inter-relationship matrix certainly, independent variables are provided in the Table I. Indicate philosophy range from dos.ninety-five having sensed individual argument (PPC) to help you 5.68 for personal profile (PR). Frequency shipping of productivity (perhaps not revealed right here however, offered through to demand) because of the responding teams shows ISM having thirty two.8 %, CLM having 31 per cent, ASQ having 20.1 percent and you will APICS that have 16.1 percent. When the yields is categorized by job titles, almost 34 percent originated from movie director levels, followed closely by directors (20.one percent), CEO/President/COO (19 per cent), have strings specialists (8 per cent), customers and you will agencies (5.dos % for each and every) and others (step three.4 percent).

Related statistics towards the some demographic parameters is actually placed in Table II. The duration of team that have a specific partner ranges in one 12 months to 50 years having a mean from 8.two years (median = half dozen years). The average “man-days” per mate spends deal with-to-deal with is about 97 “man-days” a year (median = twenty five weeks) having a broad adaptation ranging from 1 day to one,800 weeks. Over 74 percent of its organization could have been restored anywhere between no to help you 100 percent. It seems that hardly any have chain couples very own inventory regarding the people; one.07 per cent out-of participants had brand new partner’s inventory. (1)

The OLS regression model was used to test Hypothesis 1 through Hypothesis 6. The model appears to be fairly satisfactory with adjusted R-square (0.756) and F-value (56.5, p < 0.01) and seems to support that the research model fits well into the data. The results from OLS regression are summarized in Table III.

A confident relationships, hence, is anticipated

Consistent with H1, a respondent firm’s asset specificity (RAS) is negatively related to trust in the partner, but the relationship is marginally significant (p < 0.1). It is assumed that the firm's concern about a partner's investment in specific assets is the main route that lowered its trust in partners, given that opportunistic behavior is always possible.

The second hypothesis was also supported. The partner’s asset specificity (PAS) has a significantly positive impact on trust (t = 3.475; p < 0.01).

The company you are going to believe purchase-certain property spent of the its partner because a great determination so you’re able to their relationship, and it will end up being a rational a reaction to the latest commitment to raise its faith towards lover

Behavioral uncertainty (BU), measured by decision-making uncertainty, is negatively associated with trust in a partner as hypothesized (t = -5.202; p < 0.01). Therefore, H3 is supported. The impact of behavioral uncertainty on trust and other subsequent business decisions is becoming more important due to the increasing uncertainty in the ever-changing business environment in the post-modern world. Continuous, two-way communication should be implemented so as to lower the level of uncertainty in supply chain partnerships.

Information sharing has been cited by many studies (e.g., Bowersox et al. 2000) as the most critical agent in the trust-building process of supply chain implementation. 438; p < 0.05). Also, a path analysis was conducted in order to confirm the mediating role of information sharing on behavioral uncertainty, and the degree of relationship between behavioral uncertainty and trust. The result is shown in Figure 2. The path model seems to be acceptable based on several benchmarking statistics. The model appears to indicate that information sharing reduces the degree of uncertainty (t = -4.146; p < 0.01), which in turn enhances the level of trust (t = -; p < 0.01). Accordingly, H4 is supported.

As expected in H5-A, the level of perceived satisfaction (SAT) has a positive and significant impact on the level of trust (t = 2.482; p < 0.05). Any business relationship that results in a sustained degree of satisfaction usually creates an environment where the trust-building process becomes much more conducive. This study seems to support such an argument.

Theo Healthplus.vn


banner kieu xuan_770x180

Chưa có bình luận

Tin đọc nhiều